All your speech and debate questions answered.

Even the ones you haven't thought to ask.

Click the links below for...

ModernBrain's FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS.
COLLEGE APPLICATION information.
Descriptions of SPEECH categories.
DEBATE terms and definitions.
Details about MOCK TRIAL contests.
MODEL UNITED NATIONS specifics.
Special speech and debate AWARDS.
Different speech and debate LEAGUES.

ModernBrain's Frequently Asked Questions

1. What Are ModernBrain's Most Popular Classes?

Our most popular classes include:

  • Elementary School: Speech and Debate Comprehensive, Littles Speech, Congress and Impromptu, Debate Comprehensive, Elementary Nationals.
  • Middle School: Speech and Debate Comprehensive, Speech Nationals, Mock Trial, Public Forum Debate, Model United Nations.
  • High School: Speech Nationals, Mock Trial, Model United Nations, Lincoln-Douglas, Congress Nationals.

2. How Many Students Are in Each ModernBrain Class?

We start our normal classes with a minimum of four students. If we have more than 10 students in a class, we’ll bring in a second instructor to maintain an optimal student-teacher ratio. For our Speech Nationals Team, if we have more than five students, we’ll bring in a second teacher to maintain that ratio.

3. Which ModernBrain Class Is the Right Fit for My Student?

It fully depends on the student. About 80% of students start with one of our comprehensive courses. If they’re in high school, they typically interview directly into one of our speech/debate competition teams or take a foundational MUN or mock trial course before interviewing for those teams. We highly recommend doing a free informational session before registering for your first course with us.

4. How Often Do ModernBrain Students Meet? What Is the Time Commitment?

  • Regular Classes: Two hours per week during the school year, with no more than two hours of homework (often completed in 30 minutes).
  • Nationals Competition Classes: Typically two hours per week, with additional workshops/scrimmages. Students are expected to practice for 30 minutes every day to remain competitively viable.
  • Tournaments: Speech/debate students normally compete every two weeks. MUN and mock trial students compete every six weeks.

5. Does ModernBrain Offer Make-Up Class Options?

Yes. If a student misses a class and communicates with us through [email protected], we will find time in the same class on a different day of the week that fits the student’s schedule. This class may be online or at a different location.

6. Can Students from Speech and Debate After-School Academies Compete at Tournaments?

Students must go to the NSDA, NCFL, and TOC competitions in high school with their schools. We provide robust support in helping that happen, including setting up NSDA accounts and corresponding with school administrators.

However, students can attend nearly all invitational/bid tournaments, NIETOC (the speech TOC), and the mock trial TOC and world championship under academy names. We are the only academy to ever win sweepstakes awards at both NIETOC and the Mock Trial TOC.

7. What Are the Differences Between Elementary and Middle School Speech and Debate Competitions?

Elementary school offers fewer competitive opportunities. Most speech categories last for five minutes. Middle school offers more opportunities; most speech categories last for ten minutes. Top fifth graders can attend middle school-level tournaments but need to lengthen their speeches. For example, last year, a fifth-grader was a national middle school finalist at the NSDA.

8. What Are ModernBrain Teachers' Credentials/Backgrounds?

To be considered for a ModernBrain coaching position, candidates need extensive experience with education/coaching and/or winning/competing at the national level. Our coaches complete certification courses on student safety and mental health, protecting students from abuse, and communicating effectively with parents. Background checks are required, and we follow a rigorous onboarding process to ensure each class is meticulously crafted and engagingly taught by experts in their fields.

9. How Can I Volunteer with ModernBrain?

Visit our volunteering page. Popular forms of volunteering include representing us at festivals like the Irvine Global Village Festival, judging younger students at competitions, or being a ModernBrain TA as you’re available throughout the season.

10. How Can We Sign Up for Private Lessons with ModernBrain?

Contact [email protected] and express which specific areas you need help with. We’ll contact coaches for availability and get back to you with a way to book them. Once you purchase your session(s), we’ll set up an appointment.

11. Does ModernBrain Offer Trial Classes?

Yes, but in a private/Zoom setting to minimize disruption to our already-running classes. Teachers dividing their focus to bring trial students up to speed on lessons distracts from their ability to effectively engage with students who have already been absorbing the content and want to learn more.

12. What Are You Looking for in Your Nationals Team Interviews?

  • Enthusiasm: If a parent does most of the talking or the student isn’t sure why they’re speaking with the interviewer, it’s a major red flag.
  • Commitment: If a student is very busy on weekends with other extracurriculars, it’s a red flag.
  • Resilience: If a student indicates they’re not good at learning from losses, it’s a red flag.
  • Expertise: We need to assume they have a foundational understanding of the concepts before they’re ready for a full season of competitions.

13. Does ModernBrain Have Lesson Plans?

Yes—our curricula are rigorously designed and vetted across years of study, updated regularly. We have full lesson plans built out and shared on Google Classroom with our students. For nationals teams, curricula are dictated by upcoming competitions, making them more modular and flexible based on students’ needs.

14. What Is ModernBrain's Refund Policy?

  • All scheduled events are subject to change. No fees will be refunded or transferred unless a child is unable to participate due to an accident or illness per physician orders.
  • ModernBrain does not offer refunds after a class begins; funds may be reallocated toward class credit for a future term.
  • In unforeseen circumstances (e.g., coach's car breaking down, outbreak at an in-person site), ModernBrain reserves the right to move up to two classes per semester from in-person to online. Impacted families will be alerted ASAP.
  • Any refunds distributed will have third-party vendor service fees subtracted (e.g., Square takes a 3.5% service fee).

15. Does ModernBrain Speak Chinese/Mandarin?

Yes--our co-founder is fluent, as are some employees!

College Counseling FAQ

1. How Can Speech, Debate, Mock Trial, or Model United Nations Help for College?

We've created a whole page dedicated to answering this question. Read about it here.

We also have several blog posts on this point. For example, click here to read about the pathways to national success in speech and debate, or click here to read our analysis about which classes are best for college.

2. What Is the C.R.A.S.H. College Counseling Framework?

The C.R.A.S.H. College Counseling Framework is a project-tracking system developed by Dr. Iain Lampert of ModernBrain, designed to help students optimize their college applications. The acronym C.R.A.S.H. stands for Competitions, Research, Academics, Service, and Hobbies, reflecting five major areas of focus that many applicants overlook when preparing for selective college admissions.

By categorizing each project or initiative under these five pillars, students ensure they devote attention to a broad range of meaningful experiences. This strategy not only highlights their strengths across multiple dimensions—such as leadership in competitions, dedication to academic research, or commitment to community service—but also helps them stand out to top-tier institutions. ModernBrain reports that since 2016, over 90% of students who follow the C.R.A.S.H. system have gained acceptance to top 20 colleges.

For more information on ModernBrain’s counseling services and success stories, visit: ModernBrain Counseling Services and ModernBrain Counselors & Successes.

3. What Is a College Signature/Passion Project?

A Passion Project is a personal, distinctive undertaking designed to showcase a student’s unique skills, interests, and potential. Developed by ModernBrain's counseling partners at InGenius Prep, this concept emphasizes crafting a project that becomes the centerpiece of a student’s college application profile. Unlike traditional extracurriculars, Passion Projects tell a compelling narrative by combining the student’s academic achievements, personal journey, and leadership qualities into a memorable and cohesive story.

Passion Projects can take many forms, such as tech-driven inventions, creative publications, community outreach initiatives, or independent research and business ventures. The key is that the project is original, student-driven, and reflects the individual’s unique passions and dedication. Successful Passion Projects weave together different elements of a student’s profile, creating a narrative thread that highlights both persistence and creativity.

For example, students might develop charitable outreach programs, design apps or software, publish work in an area of interest, or launch entrepreneurial ventures. These projects can fit any subject or interest area but must demonstrate leadership, dedication, and authenticity. A Passion Project provides high school students with a clear, impactful way to integrate their passions into their college applications, making them stand out to admissions committees.

To learn more or connect with representatives from InGenius Prep, visit: Leadership & Innovation Lab.

4. What Is a College Application Persona?

A college application persona is the clear value proposition or personality communicated through a student’s application. It helps the regional admission officer feel confident in recommending the student for admission. The persona is what makes a student stand out in a competitive applicant pool, beyond just having strong grades or test scores.

While academic qualifications are necessary to demonstrate readiness for the rigors of college, they are considered threshold criteria—factors that show a student can handle the academic challenges but do not guarantee admission. In today’s competitive admissions environment, holistic review focuses much more on a student’s persona, which ties together their passions, achievements, and personal story into a memorable and compelling application.

ModernBrain and its partners at InGenius Prep specialize in helping students develop application personas that highlight their uniqueness and strengths. For more insights, watch this joint webinar where ModernBrain and InGenius Prep explain application personas and how they can give students an edge: Webinar: Creating a Standout Application Persona.

5. What Are the Four Tiers of Extracurricular Success?

Developed by CollegeVine, the tiers of extracurricular activities categorize the impact and prestige of a student’s involvement in activities such as research projects, competitions, and hobbies. These tiers provide a framework for evaluating how impressive a student’s extracurricular achievements are to college admissions committees:

  • Tier 1: International or national-level accomplishments (e.g., winning a national championship, publishing research in a nationally recognized journal).
  • Tier 2: State-level achievements or leadership roles (e.g., state debate champion, state student government leader).
  • Tier 3: Regional recognition (e.g., placing in regional competitions, significant roles in local organizations).
  • Tier 4: General participation (e.g., being a member of a school club or sports team).

ModernBrain’s approach to college admissions success focuses on helping students identify and excel in the activities where they can maximize their potential. Through programs in speech, debate, mock trial, Model UN, and more, ModernBrain trains students to demonstrate preparation, polish, poise, and talent, enabling them to achieve Tier 1-level successes. Students without Tier 1 accomplishments often face greater challenges when applying to top 20 schools, as admissions committees prioritize exceptional extracurricular impact.

To learn more about the tiers of extracurricular activities, read CollegeVine’s guide: Breaking Down the 4 Tiers of Extracurricular Activities.

6. What Is the PVSA (Presidents Volunteer Service Award)?

Established in 2003, the President’s Volunteer Service Award (PVSA) recognizes individuals and groups who demonstrate a sustained commitment to volunteer service over a 12-month period. Community service hours can be earned through a wide variety of projects, and awards are given annually at Bronze, Silver, and Gold levels based on the total hours accumulated.

ModernBrain is a certified PVSA provider, allowing students to earn service hours through various activities, including judging competitions, coaching younger students, and serving as teaching assistants (TAs) within ModernBrain’s programs. This award is an excellent opportunity for students to showcase their leadership and dedication to service, both for college applications and for making a positive impact on their communities.

Here is a list of some of our earliest TAs: ModernBrain TAs.

To learn more about volunteering with ModernBrain to earn the PVSA, visit: Volunteer with ModernBrain.

7. What Is the NFHS (National Federation of State High School Associations)?

The NFHS serves as the national authority that promotes and protects the values of education-based high school athletics and activities. Working in collaboration with its member state associations, the NFHS provides leadership, guidance, and resources to ensure a positive and safe environment for students participating in sports and extracurricular activities. It also partners with organizations like the National Speech and Debate Association (NSDA) to support programs beyond athletics.

At ModernBrain, we prioritize student safety and development by requiring all coaches to complete certification courses through the NFHS. These courses focus on ensuring the psychological and physical well-being of students under their guidance. Additionally, all ModernBrain teaching assistants (TAs) are mandated to complete NFHS training before working with younger students, ensuring they are equipped to foster a safe and effective learning environment.

Speech Competition Glossary

1. How Do You Win Speech Competitions?

Winning speech competitions requires strategic planning, effective communication skills, and a clear understanding of how judging works. Here are the essential steps:

  • Sign up for tournaments through reputable portals like forensicstournament.net, speechwire.com, or tabroom.com. Ensure you have judges lined up to cover your entry, as most tournaments require each school or team to supply volunteer judges.
  • In preliminary rounds, speakers are ranked from first to last. The goal is to accumulate as many first-place rankings as possible to advance to elimination rounds and ultimately win.
  • Judges typically look for strong ethos (credibility), pathos (emotional connection), and logos (logical argument). Review the official judging criteria on the tournament’s ballot to understand what specific elements they will grade you on—such as vocal clarity, body language, organization, and persuasiveness.
  • Stand out with a memorable angle, fresh evidence, or a compelling personal story. Incorporating unique insights sets you apart from competitors delivering more “standard” speeches.
  • ModernBrain has coached students to over 1,000 first-place finishes by refining delivery, honing content, and developing confidence. Leveraging expert feedback ensures your speeches consistently meet and exceed judging standards.

2. What Is Declamation?

Declamation is a public speaking event where you deliver someone else’s speech—such as a TED Talk, political address, or victim impact statement—to showcase your interpretation skills. Typically, middle and high school students perform a 10-minute version, while elementary students may have a 5-minute limit. In leagues like the National Catholic Forensics League (NCFL), Declamation is offered exclusively to 9th and 10th graders; however, it’s often even more popular at the middle school level.

  • Choose a Powerful Piece
    Opt for a speech with a clear message and a strong emotional arc, ensuring it resonates both with you and your audience.
  • Build a Personal Connection
    During your introduction, clearly articulate why you selected this piece—judges appreciate genuine enthusiasm and insight.
  • Focus on Delivery
    Concentrate on vocal variety, pacing, and facial expressions. The goal is to recreate the original speech’s intent while adding your unique interpretation.

ModernBrain has a strong track record in Declamation: in the final round of the Middle School Tournament of Champions, four of the six finalists, including the champion, were ModernBrain students. You can watch their outstanding performances here.

3. What Is Dramatic Interpretation?

Dramatic Interpretation (often called “DI”) is a 10-minute performance event for middle school and high school speech competitions. In DI, students deliver a dramatic monologue—without the use of props, costumes, or additional on-stage help. The goal is to fully embody the characters and emotions of the chosen piece through vocal variation, physicality, and emotional depth.

  • Characterization
    Portray distinct characters convincingly. The sharper your transitions between characters (when more than one is featured), the more compelling your performance.
  • Emotional Resonance
    Heavy themes like racism, loss, or trauma are common in DI. Strive for authenticity and vulnerability to create a moving experience.
  • Power of Message
    Use clear storytelling to bring out the central theme—make sure the audience connects to the deeper meaning behind your piece.
  • Acting and Performance Skills
    Demonstrate command of facial expressions, voice, body language, and pacing. Judges will be evaluating how you navigate the emotional arc of the piece.
  • Unique Interpretation
    While the text may stay the same, your personal take on the characters and conflict can set you apart.

ModernBrain’s approach to Dramatic Interpretation has been proven successful: we had two finalists, including the champion, in the Middle School Tournament of Champions final round. Watch these standout performances here: ModernBrain DI Final Round.

4. What Is DUO Interpretation?

Duo Interpretation—often shortened to “Duo”—is a 10-minute speech event where two performers bring a script to life without props or costumes. Whether the selection is dramatic, humorous, or a blend of both, success in Duo hinges on strong chemistry between partners and a clear, purposeful message.

  • Teamwork & Blocking
    Both partners must coordinate their movements (also known as “blocking”) to enhance the storyline. Strategically using physical space and positioning can highlight pivotal moments and keep the audience engaged.
  • Script Selection
    Look for a piece that can fit effectively into 10 minutes and still maintain a cohesive beginning, middle, and end. A strong plot with a clear message will captivate judges and audience members.
  • Emotional Range
    While Duo may involve comedic scenes, it can also tackle serious themes. Being comfortable portraying various emotions in sync with your partner can leave a lasting impact.
  • Vocal & Physical Contrast
    Each actor should develop distinct character voices and mannerisms, ensuring that the transitions between different characters within the same piece are clear and compelling.

ModernBrain’s coaching in Duo Interpretation has proven successful on the national stage. Watch one of our championship-winning coach's performances here: ModernBrain National Champion Duo.

5. What is Expository Speaking?

Expository Speaking (often called “Expos”) is a supplemental speech event that typically lasts 5 minutes. Unlike persuasive speeches, the purpose of Expos is to entertain and inform, rather than to convince the audience to adopt a particular viewpoint.

  • Uniqueness of Message
    Your chosen topic should present fresh ideas or insights that captivate your audience.
  • Novelty of Information
    Judges reward well-researched content that goes beyond common knowledge.
  • Delivery Style
    Engaging storytelling, clear vocal variety, and polished body language help make your presentation memorable.
  • Research Quality
    Credible sources and fact-based explanations demonstrate thorough preparation.

ModernBrain coaches have both earned and coached national champions in Expository Speaking. Check out this champion performance from one of our coaches' students: Expository National Champion

6. What Is Extemporaneous Speaking?

Extemporaneous Speaking—often called “Extemp”—is a competitive speech event where speakers have 30 minutes to craft and organize a response to a politically charged or open-ended question, then deliver a 7-minute speech. Extemp speeches focus on current events, and participants are evaluated on structure, clarity, delivery, and quality of sources.

  • Structure & Clarity
    A top-notch Extemp speech follows a logical progression—introduction, body, and conclusion. Clearly signpost your main points and tie everything back to the core question.

  • Delivery Skills
    Judges look for confident posture, effective eye contact, and engaging vocal variety. Practice pacing and diction to maintain audience interest throughout your 7-minute timeframe.

  • Quality of Sources
    Credible, well-researched evidence sets excellent Extemp speeches apart. Reference reliable news outlets, peer-reviewed journals, or think tank analyses to boost your speech’s persuasive power.

There are two general topic categories.

  • Domestic/National: Focus on issues like healthcare policy, economic trends, Supreme Court decisions, and broader debates within your own country.
  • Foreign/International: Explore subjects such as global conflicts, diplomatic relations, humanitarian crises, and multinational agreements.

ModernBrain has a proven track record of coaching high-caliber Extemp speakers. Check out this nationally ranked ModernBrain alum delivering a standout Extemp performance: Nationally Ranked Extemp Speech.

7. What Is Humorous Interpretation?

Humorous Interpretation (often called “HI”) is a 10-minute individual speech event designed to showcase comedic timing, character work, and imaginative storytelling—all performed without the use of props or costumes. Competitors adapt scripts to deliver a polished piece that highlights their unique performance skills.

  • Character Transitions (Pops)
    A hallmark of HI is the performer’s ability to instantly “pop” from one character to another. Smooth, well-defined transitions impress judges and keep the audience engaged.

  • Quality of Script
    Whether you select a comedic play, short story, or another source, your script must lend itself to humor while containing enough depth for a captivating 10-minute performance.

  • Expressive Blocking
    Even without props or costumes, your movement on stage (blocking) should be dynamic and purposeful, adding dimension to the storyline and comedic impact.

  • Acting & Comedic Timing
    Judges look for an actor who can skillfully alternate pacing, facial expressions, and vocal inflection to land jokes and keep the audience laughing.

ModernBrain’s coaching in Humorous Interpretation has produced numerous finalists and champions. Watch this ModernBrain middle school finalist at the Tournament of Champions to see a stellar HI performance: ModernBrain HI Finalist.

8. What Is Impromptu Speaking?

Impromptu Speaking is a fast-paced speech event where you have 2 minutes to prepare and 5 minutes to speak on a given prompt. Topics can range from abstract nouns (like “courage” or “friendship”) to current events, quotations, or even concrete objects. The challenge is to craft a structured, engaging speech on the fly—without sounding overly rehearsed or canned.

  • Delivery & Fluency
    Judges focus on your vocal presence, eye contact, and ability to avoid excessive filler words or stumbles.
  • Topicality & Examples
    Your examples and anecdotes should directly relate to the prompt you’re given, showcasing quick thinking and relevance.
  • Structure & Clarity
    Even under time pressure, aim for a clear introduction, body, and conclusion. Smooth transitions help keep your speech coherent.
  • Authenticity & Spontaneity
    Relying on memorized anecdotes can make your speech feel stale. Be truly present in the moment—engage with the prompt in a fresh, genuine way.

ModernBrain’s coaching emphasizes creativity and on-the-spot adaptability. Here’s a former national champion, coached by ModernBrain, demonstrating these skills: ModernBrain NIETOC Champion.

9. What Is Informative Speaking?

Informative Speaking is a 10-minute memorized speech event designed to educate and entertain—rather than persuade—on a specific topic. Speakers typically use visual aids to enhance clarity and audience engagement.

  • Original Topic & Personal Connection
    Stand out by choosing a unique subject that resonates with your personal or cultural background, or shed new light on a familiar topic. This authenticity helps you captivate both judges and audiences.

  • Strong Research
    Comprehensive research—especially if it includes original findings—demonstrates credibility. Cite reputable sources and incorporate statistics, anecdotes, or expert opinions to substantiate your information.

  • Memorized & Polished Delivery
    Since the speech is 10 minutes long and must be fully memorized, polish your pacing, vocal variety, and body language to keep listeners engaged. Confidence and poise are essential for a professional impression.

  • Effective Use of Visual Aids
    Incorporating posters, slides, or handouts can bolster understanding and create visual interest. Select visuals that complement your content without overwhelming the presentation.

ModernBrain coaches emphasize connecting topics with genuine passion and conducting thorough research. Watch this speech for inspiration: National-Level Informative Speech.

10. What is Original Oratory?

Original Oratory (often shortened to “OO”) is a 10-minute, memorized, and persuasive speech event. Also known as Persuasive Speaking, it requires participants to address a social issue or problem and then propose a potential solution. The best Oratories resonate with their audience on a personal level—mixing strong evidence with heartfelt storytelling.

  • Persuasive Structure
    Clearly outline the problem, examine its causes, and provide a workable solution. Organize your points so that each section logically flows into the next.
  • Relatability & Originality
    Choose a topic that you can uniquely address—perhaps through personal anecdotes or specialized knowledge. Judges appreciate either hyper-specific subjects or broader issues approached from a fresh angle.
  • Delivery & Presence
    Maintain strong eye contact, vocal variety, and clear articulation. A polished, confident stage presence elevates your credibility and helps persuade the audience.
  • Thorough Research
    Back up your argument with reliable sources and relevant data. High-quality, cited evidence solidifies your points and demonstrates expertise.

ModernBrain’s commitment to individualized coaching has produced exceptional results in Original Oratory. We had the champion and two finalists in the Middle School Tournament of Champions. Watch their outstanding performances here: ModernBrain OO Final Round.

11. What Is Original Spoken Word Poetry?

Original Spoken Word Poetry is a 5-minute, memorized event that requires performers to present originally written poetic work. It often highlights deeply personal themes, resonating with audiences through vivid language and strong delivery.

  • Personal & Powerful Theme
    Use personal stories, experiences, and emotions to forge a genuine connection with your audience. Topics can be intimate, social, or cultural, but authenticity is key.
  • Poetic & Literary Devices
    Incorporate techniques like metaphor, rhyme, rhythm, and alliteration to add depth and musicality. Vary sentence lengths and structures to maintain engagement and emphasize key points.
  • Engaging Delivery
    Focus on vocal variety, pacing, and clear enunciation to bring your poem to life. Use expressive gestures and facial expressions to underscore important moments.

ModernBrain encourages poets to explore their creativity and personal narratives through Spoken Word Poetry. Watch this ModernBrain middle school student—a national showcase finalist—demonstrate the power of a heartfelt Spoken Word performance: ModernBrain Spoken Word Finalist.

12. What Is Poetry Interpretation?

Poetry Interpretation is a 5-minute, supplemental category that allows speakers to bring poetic literature to life through a cohesive performance. Competitors typically use a black binder (often called a “black book”) both as a prop and as a means to hold or reference their chosen poems.

  • The Black Book
    Serve as both a physical prop and a place to showcase your text. Use page turns, placement, and subtle gestures to reinforce emotional shifts in the poetry.

  • Thematic Unity
    Often involves weaving together multiple poems under a single theme or central message. Make sure each poem contributes to a cohesive narrative or argument.

  • Personal Connection & Impact
    Demonstrate how the poems resonate with you—whether through life experience, identity, or values. Authentic emotion can captivate judges and audiences alike.

  • Delivery & Characterization
    Employ vocal variety, facial expressions, and purposeful body language to animate the text. Show distinct changes in tone or pacing for different parts of the piece.

  • Clarity & Cohesion
    Maintain a clear structure so the audience follows your narrative thread from start to finish. Keep the focus on how these poems unite to form one powerful, cohesive message.

ModernBrain’s coaching emphasizes thematic depth and strong performance skills. Watch this national finalist, coached by ModernBrain, for an example of outstanding Poetry Interpretation: ModernBrain Poetry Finalist.

13. What Is Programmed Oral Interpretation?

Programmed Oral Interpretation (often shortened to “POI”) is a 10-minute performance event that merges various genres—such as articles, plays, poetry, and prose—into a single, cohesive narrative. By weaving different sources together, competitors deliver a powerful thematic statement supported by distinct characters, compelling language, and clear structure.

  • Multi-Genre Composition
    Select and combine excerpts from drama (plays, musicals, or film scripts), poetry, prose, and articles to form a unified program centered on one overarching theme.

  • Characterization & Blocking
    Use vocal variety, facial expressions, and purposeful movement to distinguish each character or source. Effective blocking brings focus to emotional shifts and pivotal moments.

  • Powerful Message
    Craft a clear thesis or thematic statement that runs through the entire performance. Each excerpt should contribute to a deeper understanding of the core idea.

  • Clarity & Structure
    Organize your pieces in a logical sequence so the audience can follow the evolving narrative. Smooth transitions and signposting between excerpts help maintain coherence.

  • Personal & Topical Connection
    The best POI pieces resonate on a personal or social level. Show why this theme matters to you—and why it should matter to your audience.

ModernBrain’s approach to POI coaching helps students find impactful selections and master delivery. Here’s a Middle School National Champion performance, coached by ModernBrain: ModernBrain POI Champion.

14. What Is Prose Interpretation?

Prose Interpretation is a 5-minute, supplemental event where performers use a black binder to hold and reference literature. Competitors typically present a single story or narrative from a prose source—such as a novel, short story, or literary essay—focusing on bringing the text’s characters and emotional arc to life.

  • The Black Book
    Acts as both a practical reference and a prop. Thoughtful page turns, positioning, and subtle movements can add emphasis and drama.

  • Single Narrative Structure
    Choose an engaging piece with a clear beginning, middle, and end. Building toward a strong climax ensures audience investment in the storyline.

  • Characterization & Emotional Range
    Convey distinct voices, personalities, or perspectives using vocal variety and facial expressions. Whether it’s humorous or dramatic, authentic emotion keeps the audience engaged.

  • Connection & Message
    Show how the narrative resonates with you and why it matters. A memorable “takeaway” or message helps your performance stand out.

  • Literary Source
    Must be taken from a prose work such as a novel, short story, or published nonfiction piece. Ensure your cutting remains cohesive and highlights the text’s most compelling moments.

ModernBrain’s coaching emphasizes thoughtful piece selection and dynamic delivery. Check out this nationally ranked Prose Interpretation coached by ModernBrain: ModernBrain Prose Performance.

15. What Is SPAR/Spontaneous Argumentation?

SPAR (short for “Spontaneous Argumentation”) is a rapid-fire speech format that, while not recognized as a national event at the high school level or at many major tournaments, remains a popular practice activity—especially in middle school (MS) and elementary school (ES) programs. Some high school (HS) students also engage in SPAR for fun or skill development.

  • Format & Time Structure
    2 minutes to prepare. 2 minutes to argue as the Affirmative. 2 minutes to argue as the Negative. 2 minutes of cross-examination. 2 minutes each for closing statements (Affirmative and Negative).
  • Topic Selection
    Competitors may be given one to three prompts. Each debater or team typically chooses one topic to debate.

Judges often rank participants on logic, clarity, persuasiveness, and spontaneity. Charisma and delivery style also factor heavily into the overall score. Some versions allow or encourage light research beforehand, while others strictly emphasize improvisation.

ModernBrain coaches regularly incorporate SPAR in their curricula to develop quick-thinking and effective argumentation. Watch these students, coached by ModernBrain, in a SPAR match: ModernBrain SPAR Debate.

16. What Is Storytelling?

Storytelling is a 5-minute supplemental event where competitors interpret someone else’s words, typically aiming the performance at a children’s audience. While you can incorporate a chair as a single prop, success relies on the performer’s ability to bring the story to life through engaging vocal variety, expressive movements, and a clear, age-appropriate message.

  • Intended Audience
    Aim your storyline, language, and tone toward children. Strive for clarity, simplicity, and relatability.
  • Characterization
    Use distinct voices, facial expressions, and body language. Vary your pitch and pacing to create an immersive experience.
  • Use of a Chair (Single Prop)
    Sit, stand, or move around the chair to convey different scenes or moods. Employ subtle prop work without overshadowing the story.
  • Clear, Engaging Message
    Ensure the plot and moral of the story are easily understood. Select or adapt a piece that resonates with young listeners.
  • Ease of Understanding
    Keep the performance straightforward, avoiding overly complex language. Maintain a strong narrative flow from beginning to end.

ModernBrain’s coaching emphasizes building confidence and creativity in Storytelling. Watch this Middle School National Showcase Finalist, coached by ModernBrain, for a heartwarming example of Storytelling: ModernBrain Storytelling Finalist.

Debate Competition Glossary

1. How Do You Win Debate Competitions?

Debate is fundamentally about persuading the judge that your interpretation of the resolution is more valid than your opponent’s. Judges strive to remain tabula rasa (blank slate), so both sides have an equal chance of winning. To excel, you must out-argue your opponents, anticipate unspoken objections from the judge, and adapt to the evolving dynamics of the round—much like a strategic game of chess.

  • Clearly define key terms and the scope of the topic. Ensure your argument directly addresses the resolution’s central question.
  • Anticipate possible arguments your opponent might make. Gather evidence and craft counterarguments in advance to stay ahead.
  • Establish a compelling opening position that is difficult for opponents to refute. Build logical, cohesive arguments that flow from one point to the next.
  • Monitor the debate’s direction and modify your approach as needed. Identify which arguments resonate most with the judge and prioritize them in later speeches.
  • Use confident delivery, clear language, and credible sources to enhance persuasiveness. Balance emotional appeal with logical rigor to make your case compelling.
  • In the final moments, distill the debate into the key reasons why you prevail. Compare it to checkmate—preserve the crucial “pieces” of your argument to clinch victory.

ModernBrain offers training in all major forms of debate.

2. What Is Lincoln-Douglas Debate?

Lincoln-Douglas (LD) Debate is a one-on-one format typically centered around philosophical or ethical issues. Each debate lasts about 45 minutes, and a single topic is debated for roughly two months. While traditional LD emphasizes abstract philosophy (e.g., Kantian ethics vs. Utilitarianism), progressive LD may incorporate fast-paced argumentation, policy proposals, and debate theory. Success depends on deep research, judge adaptation, and preparing “blocks” (pre-written responses) to common arguments.

In traditional LD, you use primary value (main principle) and a value criterion (the measure for adherence to that principle). Some judges prefer traditional style, focusing on clarity and deep philosophical structure. Other judges embrace faster delivery, heavy evidence, and creative argumentation techniques.

ModernBrain has a proven track record in Lincoln-Douglas Debate. Recently, a former and a current ModernBrain student claimed 1st and 2nd place at the Middle School Tournament of Champions—demonstrating our commitment to rigorous research, skillful strategy, and personalized mentorship.

3. What Is Parliamentary Debate?

Parliamentary Debate—often shortened to “Parli”—is a two-on-two, spontaneous debate format. Competitors have 20 minutes of preparation time to craft their arguments, and the overall round usually lasts about an hour. The debate unfolds across six speeches: the first two speeches outline each side’s cases, the next two speeches focus on refutations, and the last two speeches conclude and crystallize the arguments.

  • Types of Resolutions
    Policy Topics: One side proposes a plan; the other defends the status quo or presents a counterplan. Fact Topics: Debating whether something is “more likely than not” to be true. Value Topics: Arguing why prioritizing one concept over another is more beneficial.
  • Speech Structure
    First Two Speeches: Constructive arguments (cases) are presented. Second Two Speeches: Refutations, counterarguments, and clash occur. Final Two Speeches: Conclusions and crystallization of the debate.
  • Evidence & Style
    Generally less evidence-heavy than other debate formats, emphasizing logic and rhetoric. Requires adaptability and strong teamwork to handle a range of potential resolutions.
  • Organizations & Competitions
    The National Parliamentary Debate League (NPDL) hosts tournaments, but Parliamentary Debate is not a standard national championship event in MS/HS. Popular in some regions and at the college level for its spontaneity and range of topics.

ModernBrain’s students have excelled in Parliamentary Debate, showcasing quick thinking and collaboration. Watch these former ModernBrain coaches’ students in a national elimination round: ModernBrain Parli Debate.

4. What Is Policy Debate?

Policy Debate is a two-on-two format widely regarded as the oldest and often the most research-intensive form of scholastic debate. A single topic (or “resolution”) is debated for an entire year, and rounds typically last over 90 minutes. Because of its technical depth, Policy Debate frequently involves rapid speaking, complex argumentation, and extensive evidence files.

Given the complexity, many judges have extensive experience processing fast-paced, highly technical debates. Lay judges do exist, but the majority of Policy Debate is geared toward judges fluent in “policy speak.”

ModernBrain’s Policy Debate program has made history by winning the NSDA National Championship and the Middle School Tournament of Champions in back-to-back years. Watch one of our championship-winning Policy Debate rounds here: ModernBrain Policy Debate Champion.

5. What Is Public Forum Debate?

Public Forum (PF) Debate is a two-on-two format where teams argue a resolution that changes every month or two. While it shares similarities with Policy Debate in terms of research and strategy, PF tends to be less fast-paced and more accessible to a wider range of audiences, including lay judges. Teams must thoroughly understand the topic—from background context to potential impacts—and present a clear narrative about how the world changes if the resolution is true (or false).

ModernBrain has cultivated many nationally ranked PF debaters through intensive topic exploration and adaptable delivery strategies.

Watch these former students of ModernBrain coaches secure a semifinal victory in a national competition: ModernBrain PF Semifinals.

6. What Is the Ronald Reagan Great Communicator Debate Series?

The Ronald Reagan Great Communicator Debate Series is an annual tournament hosted by the Ronald Reagan Foundation. In contrast to the fast-paced, highly technical style of Policy Debate, this format prioritizes accessibility, delivery, and clarity—focusing on everyday language rather than niche jargon. Competitors debate a fact-based resolution (whether something is “more true than not”) in a one-on-one format, incorporating humor and strong speaking skills to connect with both judges and lay audiences.

ModernBrain has consistently excelled in this format, with students reaching the top 16 nationally every year.

7. What Is Student Congress?

Student Congress (also called Congressional Debate) simulates a legislative assembly where debaters propose and debate bills and resolutions. Participants speak in turns, 3 minutes each, either affirming or negating the legislation. After these speeches, they field questions from their peers. At the end, competitors are ranked based on the quality of their contributions, including research, refutation, engagement, and delivery.

  • Docket of Bills & Resolutions
    Topics are distributed beforehand (typically two to six weeks in advance), allowing participants to prepare arguments. Debaters aim to support or oppose each bill with substantive evidence.
  • Engaged Debate & Spontaneity
    Merely reading a pre-written speech falls flat. The best Congress participants adapt in real time—responding directly to opponents’ points and weighing impacts.
  • Legislative Simulation
    Speakers persuade the chamber—like real legislators—to vote on each bill. Success lies in guiding the assembly toward your perspective through logic, evidence, and rhetorical skill.

ModernBrain has coached middle and high school level state and national champions in Student Congress. Watch the 2022 California State Final Round Winner’s Speech here: ModernBrain Student Congress Champion.

Check out the 2022 Middle School National Champion’s Speech, also coached by ModernBrain: ModernBrain Student Congress Champion (Middle School, 2022).

8. What Is World Schools Debate?

World Schools Debate is an internationally popular format that blends both prepared (topics released in advance) and impromptu (topics given just one hour before the round) debates. Teams typically have 3–5 members, but only three speak in any given round. This style shares similarities with Parliamentary Debate, particularly in its open engagement format—teams can interject with Points of Information (POIs) during opponents’ speeches rather than having a formal cross-examination period.

  • Scoring & Criteria
    Judges score speeches on Content, Style, and Strategy. Winners are determined by overall points rather than strict win/loss records on arguments alone.
  • Global Popularity
    Recognized worldwide, with national and international championships. Emphasizes critical thinking, persuasive delivery, and adaptability.

ModernBrain provided consultation to the back-to-back NSDA World Schools Debate Champions from West Los Angeles, offering strategic insights that helped them secure decisive wins in 2022 (10-3 decision) and 2023 (12-1 decision).

Watch the 2022 NSDA World Schools Debate Final: 2022 Final Round

Watch the 2023 NSDA World Schools Debate Final: 2023 Final Round

9. What Is the Difference Between Lay/Traditional and Tech/Progressive Debate?

Debate styles often fall under two broad categories—Lay/Traditional and Tech/Progressive. Each approach has its own pace, content focus, and set of priorities when it comes to evaluating arguments and performance.

  • Rate of Speaking
    Lay/Traditional: Debaters speak slowly and clearly to ensure the audience can easily follow.
    Tech/Progressive: Rapid delivery to fit as many arguments as possible into limited time (often called “spreading”).
  • Content & Focus
    Lay/Traditional: Centered on whether the resolution itself is true or false, with straightforward reasoning.
    Tech/Progressive: May delve into meta-debate (debating the rules or theory of debate), advanced policy proposals, and complex argument structures (disadvantages, counterplans, kritiks, etc.).
  • Evaluation & Style
    Lay/Traditional: Judges prioritize clarity, persuasion, rhetoric, and logical organization—akin to a public speaking competition.
    Tech/Progressive: Emphasizes extensive research, critical thinking, and the ability to compare arguments at a high level (impact calculus, theory, etc.).

ModernBrain coaches have created several video tutorials to demystify debate terminology and help students prepare for both Traditional and Progressive styles:

Whether you prefer a lay/traditional approach or a tech/progressive style, understanding both can make you a versatile debater who can adapt to any judge and format.

10. What Is Spreading in Debate?

“Spreading” is a speed-reading technique employed in technical/progressive debate formats. Debaters speak at a rapid pace so they can present more arguments and include additional details within time limits. Because lay or traditional judges typically value clarity over quantity, spreading is usually inappropriate in front of non-technical audiences. In many tournaments, judges will also receive a digital copy of the debaters’ cases to follow along if the speed becomes overwhelming.

  • Purpose
    Allow debaters to fit a larger number of arguments into limited speech time. Present extensive evidence and nuanced reasoning for each contention.
  • Context & Audience
    Common in tech/progressive debate settings (e.g., Policy or some LD circuits). Avoided in lay/traditional formats where judges expect slower, clearer communication.
  • Practical Support
    Judges often receive digital “speech docs” to track arguments as they’re read. Spreading can be challenging to process solely by ear.
  • Considerations
    Rapid delivery must remain intelligible; if judges can’t follow, the arguments won’t count. Clear enunciation and strong organization are vital to avoid losing impact.

For a deeper look at spreading, check out WIRED’s investigative video: WIRED on Spreading.

11. What Is Flowing in Debate?

Flowing refers to the note-taking system debaters use to keep track of both their own arguments and those of their opponents during a round. By writing in shorthand and organizing points in a structured layout, debaters can quickly reference key ideas, spot weaknesses, and formulate responses. Proper flow technique is crucial for success in more technical forms of debate, where multiple arguments and subpoints must be followed accurately.

  • Purpose
    Capture every major claim, piece of evidence, and rebuttal in a way that’s easy to revisit. Provide a quick visual overview of the debate’s structure, from initial constructive arguments to final refutations.
  • Organization
    Typically involves multiple “columns” representing each speech or argument segment. Shorthand is used to save time and maintain clarity.
  • Responsiveness
    Flowing allows debaters to see where specific points have or haven’t been addressed. Helps ensure you don’t drop (ignore) critical arguments from the other side.

Want to learn more? Check out this video for an in-depth explanation of flowing techniques and examples of “good flow” vs. “bad flow”: Flowing in Debate

Mock Trial Glossary

1. How Does Mock Trial Work?

Mock Trial simulates courtroom proceedings by assigning teams of 4 to 12 students a fictional case or fact pattern—often 50 to 300 pages in length. Each team prepares both sides of the case (prosecution/plaintiff and defense) and performs in front of judges or scorers, who evaluate everything from argumentation to witness portrayal.

  • The Case & Roles
    Students receive a detailed case packet outlining facts, affidavits, and evidence. Teams split into attorneys and witnesses, each with distinct responsibilities.
  • Courtroom Presentations
    Each round includes opening statements, direct examinations, cross examinations, and closing arguments. Attorneys must manage time effectively to cover all required sections.
  • Objections & Rules of Evidence
    If one side believes the other side’s evidence or questions violate the rules, they raise an objection. Knowing technical definitions and applying them with precision is crucial.
  • Scoring & Judging
    Performances (by both attorneys and witnesses) are typically scored on a 10-point scale. The team with the most points overall wins.
  • Strategy & Teamwork
    Develop a clear theme—a concise, memorable phrase summing up your side’s core argument. Shape a “case theory” that tells a compelling story: what happened and why it proves guilt or innocence. Since both attorneys and witnesses are scored, balanced teamwork and strong individual performances are key.

ModernBrain’s coaching philosophy emphasizes storytelling, legal strategy, and presentation skills. Watch ModernBrain-coached students win a college-level national championship: ModernBrain Mock Trial Champions.

2. How Can I Write a Direct Examination in Mock Trial?

A well-crafted direct examination involves open-ended questions designed to highlight the witness’s story and build credibility with the jury. Unlike cross-examination, direct typically comes from the attorney representing the same side as the witness—meaning they’re collaborating to establish a coherent narrative.

  • Clear, Open-Ended Questions
    Encourage the witness to tell their story in detail. Avoid leading questions that suggest a “yes” or “no” answer.
  • Logical Flow & Structure
    Anticipate what the jury (or judge) needs to understand first, next, and last. Use simple language that helps listeners follow the storyline.
  • Witness Preparation
    The witness should fully know their statement and character background. Credibility stems from confident, consistent answers.
  • Anticipate Objections & Pitfalls
    Prepare the witness to handle challenging topics without stumbling. Understand the rules of evidence so you can phrase questions that won’t be objected to.

For a real-world example, watch this ModernBrain Mock Trial Coach deliver a direct examination in a scuba diving negligence case: ModernBrain Direct Examination Example.

3. How Can I Write a Cross-Examination in Mock Trial?

A strong cross-examination strategically reinforces your case theory and challenges the credibility of the opposing side’s witnesses. Legal expert Irving Younger outlined the “10 Commandments of Cross,” which emphasize concise, leading questions and precise control over witness testimony.

  • Succinct & Focused
    Keep questions short and simple. Avoid letting the witness elaborate on answers that harm your narrative.
  • Leading Questions
    Phrase each query so the witness can answer only “yes” or “no.” Control the flow of information by structuring questions around the case facts.
  • Prepared & Evidence-Based
    Base each question on a specific page or line from the case packet. Pinpoint inconsistencies or weaknesses in the witness’s statements. Pull out details that support your version of events. Undercut the opposing team’s arguments by highlighting contradictions.
  • Credibility Attacks
    Expose biases, prior inconsistent statements, or implausible details. Undermine the witness’s reliability in the eyes of the judge and jury.

For an example of a strategic cross, watch this ModernBrain Mock Trial coach cross-examining a defendant in a showcase round (cross occurs in the second half of the video): Mock Trial Cross-Examination Example.

4. How Can I Write an Opening Statement in Mock Trial?

In Mock Trial, your opening statement sets the stage for the entire case by introducing your side’s theme (or “theory”) and highlighting the core facts and witnesses. It should be clear, concise, and easy for someone who hasn’t read the case to follow.

  • Theme & Case Theory
    Present a memorable phrase or concept to anchor your side’s argument. Show how your case theory explains what really happened and why it matters.
  • Burden of Proof
    State whether you/the prosecution/plaintiff must prove your case “beyond a reasonable doubt” or by a “preponderance of the evidence,” depending on criminal vs. civil trial.
  • Key Facts & Witnesses
    Briefly outline the most important facts. Introduce the witnesses who will support these facts, without revealing too much detail.
  • Clear & Streamlined Delivery
    Avoid excessive legal jargon or overloading the judge/jury with minor details. Keep it organized so the audience knows what to expect during the trial.
  • Persuasive & Engaging
    Use confident tone and body language. Keep the structure logical—like telling a concise yet compelling story that piques the jury’s interest.

For a more thorough explanation, visit this in-depth guide: Mock Trial Opening Statement Guide

And check out these opening statements from an International Mock Trial League semifinal round (both delivered by ModernBrain students): Semifinal Round Opening Statements.

5. How Can I Write a Closing Argument in Mock Trial?

A closing argument in Mock Trial is your opportunity to tie together the evidence, witnesses, and legal framework you’ve presented (or challenged) throughout the trial. Typically 6–9 minutes in length, a strong closing should reinforce your side’s theme and address key points raised by your opponent.

  • Restate the Theme & Case Theory
    Begin by reminding the judge/jury of your overarching narrative. Connect your side’s story directly to the evidence shown during the trial.
  • Burden of Proof
    Clearly outline whether the prosecution/plaintiff has met their legal burden (e.g., beyond a reasonable doubt, preponderance of evidence). Argue why they have—or haven’t—satisfied this standard.
  • Summarize Critical Evidence
    Highlight your strongest exhibits and witness testimonies. Undermine or dismiss the credibility of opposing evidence where possible.
  • Respond to Trial Developments
    Address any surprising turns or unique arguments made by the opposing side. Adapt your final message to what actually happened in court, rather than relying on a rigid script.
  • Persuasive & Engaging Delivery
    Use a confident, conversational tone. Maintain clear organization, leading the judge/jury through your final takeaways.

For an in-depth breakdown, see this closing argument guide: Mock Trial Closing Argument Advice

Watch these closings from an international league final round of Mock Trial (both delivered by ModernBrain students): Mock Trial Final Round Closings.

6. What Are the Different Types of Mock Trial Witnesses?

All witnesses in Mock Trial are scored—often out of 10 points for direct examination and 10 points for cross-examination. Judges look for character consistency, responsiveness, and believability under pressure. While every witness must maintain a strong performance, there are generally four main categories:

  • Professional/Expert Witnesses: Qualified under Rule 702 (e.g., forensics experts, psychologists, detectives). Must simplify technical terms and present complex data in an understandable way. Often use demonstratives or analogies to clarify their expert opinions.
  • Character Witnesses: Known for distinct, sometimes comedic or theatrical delivery. May use accents, mannerisms, or vivid storytelling to stand out. Goal is to bring color and personality to the case while staying believable.
  • Party Representatives: Can be a defendant or a key individual directly involved in the case (a plaintiff). Typically allowed to observe other witness testimonies under Rule 615. Must show believable reactions and adapt to details that emerge during trial.
  • Sympathetic Witnesses: Serve as emotional anchors, often with dramatic backgrounds or personal involvement. Aim to evoke empathy through credible, heartfelt storytelling. May display heightened emotions (crying, anger, etc.) at a pivotal moment for greater impact.

For examples of these witness types in competition:

These witness roles were portrayed by or coached by ModernBrain coaches, showcasing the diverse styles that help teams succeed in Mock Trial competitions. Here's MORE advice on being a great mock trial witness.

7. What Are the Mock Trial Burdens of Proof?

In Mock Trial, the burden of proof refers to the legal standard the moving party must meet to prevail in a case. Although Mock Trial outcomes are decided by point totals rather than actual verdicts, understanding these legal standards is essential for accurate and persuasive presentations.

In criminal trials, the prosecution must prove the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. This means they present so convincingly that there is no reasonable alternative explanation for the facts. If such a reasonable alternative exists, the prosecution has not met its burden.

Legally, the defense does not have to call witnesses or provide evidence, as the obligation lies solely with the prosecution to establish guilt. In Mock Trial, however, the defense still needs to present a cohesive case to earn points, even though it does not bear the burden of proof. When discussing this standard, teams must avoid common errors such as saying “beyond any doubt” or “beyond a shadow of a doubt,” which are incorrect. The precise term to use is “beyond a reasonable doubt.”

In civil trials, the plaintiff must show that its claim is more likely than not—just over fifty percent—true. This standard is lower than “beyond a reasonable doubt.” Although the defense in a real civil case has no obligation to prove an alternative explanation, it can elect to raise an affirmative defense to shift some or all of the responsibility onto the plaintiff. A typical example is comparative fault, in which the defense argues that the plaintiff shares greater responsibility for the harm they suffered.

Special instructions in Mock Trial materials may clarify whether affirmative defenses are permissible and how they should be handled. Teams that misstate the burden of proof in civil cases by calling it “beyond a reasonable doubt” instead of “more likely than not” risk losing credibility and valuable points.

8. What's Empire Mock Trial?

Empire Mock Trial is a major international Mock Trial competition founded in 2007. It hosts in-person tournaments in September and November, as well as online contests in October and May/June, drawing teams from around the globe. ModernBrain regularly participates in Empire events, with students having made it to the finals and earned top attorney and witness awards. The organization has also achieved team awards every single time it has attended, reflecting a consistent level of high performance.

A standout feature of Empire Mock Trial is its “guest witness” system, where each team exchanges one witness with a different team. This format requires both sides to improvise on direct examination, testing their teamwork, collaboration, and quick thinking.

Another unique element is the Pretrial Oral Argument (POA), during which teams argue whether key pieces of evidence should be admitted or excluded before the trial formally begins. This adds an extra layer of complexity and legal strategy to the competition.

For an example of ModernBrain in action at Empire Mock Trial, watch this closely contested round featuring a split decision against another top national team:
ModernBrain at Empire Mock Trial.

9. What's the International Mock Trial League?

Founded in 2022, the International Mock Trial League (IMT) is one of the fastest-growing virtual mock trial organizations in the world. Open to students in grades 8–12, it attracts teams from across the United States—both East and West Coasts—as well as Canada, China, Hong Kong, Costa Rica, South Korea, and beyond. IMT features student-written cases judged by a panel of lawyers and college-level mock trial competitors, offering multiple contests each year at zero cost to participating teams (as long as they can provide a qualified judge).

Unlike some tournaments, IMT keeps its rounds relatively short, limiting each side to two attorneys and two witnesses. There is no Pretrial Oral Argument or guest witness element, making the format more streamlined yet still rigorously competitive.

ModernBrain students have thrived in this environment, placing at every IMT tournament since its inception and frequently dominating the podium—sometimes claiming first through third place.

For free case materials, recordings of semifinal and final rounds (including ModernBrain performances), and other resources, visit the official IMT website: International Mock Trial League Resources.

10. What's Teach Democracy / The Constitutional Rights Foundation (CRF) Mock Trial?

Teach Democracy (also referred to as the Constitutional Rights Foundation or CRF) oversees California’s primary Mock Trial league, open exclusively to schools. Winners from local county competitions advance to the state championship.

Compared to other mock trial circuits, CRF Mock Trial has shorter directs, crosses, openings, and closings, emphasizing large team participation and broad educational exposure over more theatrical elements. Teams are also subject to stricter rules about using demonstratives, staging witness accents or impressions, and wearing costumes.

ModernBrain does not directly send students to CRF tournaments but does provide support for those who participate. Both middle school and high school levels are offered, allowing a wide range of students to gain foundational courtroom skills. To learn more about program details, including competition rules and format, visit the official site: Teach Democracy / CRF Mock Trial Program.

11. What's Peer Potential Mock Trial?

Peer Potential Mock Trial, founded in the mid-2010s, has grown into the largest mock trial league in all of China, drawing participants from major cities such as Hong Kong, Hangzhou, Beijing, and Guangzhou. Students compete in English and are typically evaluated by American judges—including legal professionals and members of the American Mock Trial Association. The league hosts both a winter virtual and summer in-person competition, culminating in a special showcase round where top judges perform mock trials to inspire contestants. Cases often come from college-level mock trial materials or from the Empire Mock Trial circuit, challenging students to master complex facts and courtroom procedures.

ModernBrain coaches are frequently called upon to guide leading teams to the final rounds or to serve as judges. For a glimpse of high-level Peer Potential Mock Trial action, check out the following final rounds:

12. What's the MockOn Tournament of Champions?

Founded in 2020 by top college-level mock trial coaches and competitors, the MockOn Tournament of Champions is a premier virtual event that invites leading mock trial programs from around the globe. It employs the same streamlined format used by the International Mock Trial League, with teams fielding two attorneys and two witnesses on each side of the case.

Despite only launching in recent years, MockOn has quickly built a reputation for attracting high-caliber teams that thrive under competitive pressures. ModernBrain has consistently placed among the top five teams and secured the highest-ranked attorney honors every year it has participated. The tournament’s final rounds bring together the best of the best, often judged by experienced legal professionals or noteworthy “celebrity” figures in the mock trial community.

For a closer look at the action, watch the 2023 Final Round, where a ModernBrain coach served as a celebrity judge: MockOn 2023 Final Round.

13. What's Gladiator Mock Trial?

Gladiator Mock Trial is widely regarded as the most challenging and prestigious mock trial tournament in the world. Unlike other competitions that rely on cohesive teams, Gladiator invites individual contestants—selected through an application process—and assembles them into ad hoc teams on-site. Competitors must be ready to serve as both prosecution and defense attorneys, as well as witnesses for both sides. Each participant has only a few weeks to study the assigned case, and then must adapt quickly when additional twists are introduced mid-tournament.

During the competition, contestants perform direct examinations with partners they may have just met, testing their spontaneity, teamwork, and command of courtroom procedure. Applications usually open in February, with the competition taking place in the summer.

In 2024, a ModernBrain mentee made history by becoming the first international student to reach the Gladiator Final (top 3 out of 60). Watch the highlight of this achievement here: ModernBrain Mentee’s Gladiator Final.

Model United Nations (MUN) Glossary

1. How Does Model United Nations Work?

MUN is an academic simulation of the United Nations, where students role-play as delegates from different countries to solve real-world issues through collaboration and diplomacy. Conferences are held in-person and online, hosted by schools, universities, and other organizations for various grade levels. Teams register for a conference, receive a country assignment, and represent that country across multiple committees. Beginners are encouraged to start with a smaller, novice-friendly conference before diving into larger events with thousands of delegates.

Preparation is key to succeeding at your first conference. Delegates typically complete a Position Paper summarizing their country’s stance, an Opening Speech to introduce their goals, and a Research Binder with key information and resources for committee discussions. Understanding how to collaborate on writing resolutions and knowing basic country policies will also enhance your experience.

MUN is typically scored based on a student’s ability to demonstrate mastery of their assigned country and the issues being debated. Judges use a point-based system to evaluate the quality of examples, relevance of evidence, depth of analysis, and overall understanding of the country and issues.

ModernBrain offers three levels of MUN - an elementary/middle school MUN for Kids course, an MUN foundational course for older students, and an MUN National competition team.

2. How Can I Win an Outstanding Delegate Award?

Winning a Best Delegate award in Model United Nations (MUN) hinges on a blend of thorough preparation, effective communication, and strategic participation throughout the conference. Delegates must start by conducting comprehensive research on their assigned countries and the topics under discussion. This foundational knowledge enables them to craft insightful position papers and draft resolutions that reflect their country’s stance accurately. Developing strong public speaking skills is crucial, as delivering clear, persuasive speeches can significantly influence the debate and garner support from other delegates. Additionally, understanding the rules of procedure and mastering negotiation techniques are essential for navigating committee sessions successfully and building meaningful alliances.

During the conference, active participation in both moderated and unmoderated caucuses is vital. Delegates should leverage these opportunities to lobby for support, form coalitions, and collaborate on drafting resolutions. Bringing valuable contributions to discussions by introducing well-researched facts and innovative solutions helps delegates stand out. Crafting resolutions with a solid core that can withstand negotiations ensures that their proposals gain traction and support from a majority of the committee. Moreover, maintaining a balance between assertiveness and likability fosters positive relationships with fellow delegates and committee chairs, which can be advantageous when awards are being considered. Being adaptable and willing to adjust strategies based on the evolving dynamics of the committee demonstrates resilience and strategic thinking.

Consistency and adaptability are key to sustaining a strong presence throughout the event. Delegates must remain engaged even during periods of committee fatigue, ensuring that their contributions remain impactful from start to finish. Understanding and catering to the preferences of the chair, while maintaining professionalism and avoiding excessive flattery, can significantly influence the perception of performance. Additionally, being willing to compromise without compromising core values, and effectively managing time and responsibilities, showcases a delegate’s capability to lead and collaborate.

ModernBrain has coached students to dozens of top MUN awards. Here's a list.

3. What Is a Moderated Caucus in MUN?

"Mods" are timed, formal sessions of debate in Model United Nations (MUN) that focus on addressing specific aspects of a larger issue. Utilizing moderated caucuses early in the conference allows delegates to flesh out and debate different ideas in a structured manner. For example, a delegate might propose a moderated caucus on the duration of government patents, enabling countries with similar stances to present their views and identify potential allies. Moderated caucuses facilitate productive conversations by maintaining a narrow and focused topic, enforcing time limits for each speaker, and providing the flexibility to extend discussions if necessary. To initiate a moderated caucus, a delegate raises their placard and specifies the duration, speaking time, and topic, ensuring that the conversation remains organized and relevant.

When participating in a moderated caucus, delegates should treat the session as an ongoing conversation, maintaining a balance between formality and engagement. It is important to connect points to what others have said, acknowledging and respecting differing viewpoints even in disagreement. Staying on topic is crucial to avoid sidetracking the discussion, ensuring that each contribution is related to the moderated caucus’s focus. Additionally, backing points with data and research strengthens arguments and grounds the discussion in factual information. The content of speeches should adapt to the conference’s progression: providing context and potential solutions at the beginning, offering detailed summaries and feasibility analyses in the middle, and advocating for effective resolutions while explaining their benefits at the end.

Several logistical considerations enhance the effectiveness of moderated caucuses. Delegates must carefully manage the length of the caucus and the speaking time allotted to each participant, ensuring that the total duration is evenly divisible by the speaking time to allow for orderly participation. Choosing an appropriate caucus topic that is neither too broad nor too narrow is essential for productive debate. Additionally, delegates who successfully motion for a moderated caucus gain the advantage of speaking first or last, which can be strategically beneficial. During the caucus, delegates should raise their placards to indicate their desire to speak and manage their speaking time efficiently, yielding any unused time to the Chair if necessary.

4. What Is an Unmoderated Caucus in MUN?

"Unmods" are informal discussions in Model United Nations (MUN) that allow delegates to engage in conversations without the constraints of individual speaking time limits. These sessions provide an opportunity to meet with other delegates who share similar ideas and collaborate on possible solutions to the issues being addressed. As the conference progresses, unmoderated caucuses become essential for writing working papers and drafting resolutions. For instance, after participating in a series of moderated caucuses that have sparked new ideas, a delegate might propose an unmoderated caucus to discuss these ideas further, form blocs with like-minded delegates, and begin drafting a working paper with potential solutions. By initiating an unmoderated caucus, delegates can walk around the room, connect with others, and collaboratively develop their thoughts and strategies.

There are three main activities within unmods: meeting delegates, forming blocs, and gaining support for resolutions. During these sessions, delegates can walk around to hear a wide range of ideas, share their own perspectives, and identify potential allies. Forming blocs involves grouping with other delegates who are committed to working together to draft a resolution, which may involve switching or merging blocs as ideas evolve throughout the conference. Additionally, unmods are crucial for gaining support for resolutions by writing draft proposals with your bloc and seeking feedback from delegates outside your group.

To effectively participate in an unmoderated caucus, delegates should approach these sessions with professionalism and respect. Treat unmods as ongoing conversations where politeness and acknowledgment of others’ ideas are paramount, even in cases of disagreement. Delegates should leverage their strengths and consider their roles within the group, whether it’s taking the lead in writing or ensuring that everyone has an opportunity to speak. When proposing an unmoderated caucus, a delegate might raise their placard and motion for a specific duration, such as a "10-minute unmoderated caucus." If the motion passes by majority vote, the caucus begins, allowing delegates to actively engage and collaborate.

5. How Can I Write a Position Paper in MUN?

A Position Paper, also known as a Policy Paper, is a crucial one-page document that outlines your country’s stance on the specific issue or topic your Model United Nations (MUN) committee will address. The primary goals of a Position Paper are to showcase your country’s unique understanding of the issue, illustrate its historical and current relationship to the topic with relevant examples, and present viable policies and ideas that your country wishes to see incorporated into the resolution.

The first paragraph should establish your country’s position by providing a brief history and framing the issue in a way that resonates with other delegates. The second paragraph should detail your country’s relationship to the topic, highlighting past policies, successes, or failures, and demonstrating how these experiences shape your current stance. The final section should outline clear, concise, and SMART (Specific, Measurable, Actionable, Realistic, Timely) policies that address the issue, ensuring they are realistic within the committee’s mandate and capable of garnering broad support. An optional fourth paragraph can offer additional supporting material, such as case studies or specific data, that reinforces your arguments and adds depth to your proposals.

To maximize the effectiveness of your Position Paper and increase your chances of winning awards, it is essential to focus on clarity, conciseness, and originality. Avoid including irrelevant information or fluff; every sentence should either present research-based facts or propose actionable solutions. Utilizing strong evidence, such as statistics, names, and dates, can enhance the credibility of your arguments and impress the chairs. Additionally, introducing unique solutions or innovative interpretations can set your paper apart, capturing the chair’s attention and demonstrating your ability to think critically and creatively. Proper formatting is equally important, as an organized and visually appealing paper reflects professionalism and attention to detail.

What Do These Speech Awards Mean?

1. What Is a Speech or Debate Bid?

A Speech or Debate Bid is an essential qualification process that allows outstanding students to compete in prestigious Speech and Debate Tournaments of Champions (TOCs). Unlike regular tournaments where any student can participate, bid tournaments serve as preliminary competitions where students must achieve exceptional results to earn their place in these elite events. The primary purpose of a bid is to ensure that only the top-performing debaters and speakers advance to higher-level competitions, maintaining the high standards and competitive integrity of the TOCs.

Bid tournaments are designated by various institutions and organizations, each with its own set of criteria and levels of prestige.

  • For example, the National Invitational English Tournament of Champions (NIETOC) requires participants to excel in earlier regional competitions to qualify for their speech-focused TOC. Similarly, the University of Kentucky TOC encompasses speech, debate, and congressional categories, where students must secure bids through specific qualifying tournaments. Resources such as the NIETOC bid details and the University of Kentucky’s bid tournament guidelines provide valuable information for students preparing to qualify
  • Another notable example is the Northwestern Extemporaneous Speaking TOC, which sets its own qualifications and competitive standards, detailed on their qualifications page. These examples illustrate the varying pathways and requirements students must navigate to earn a bid, each tailored to the specific focus and history of the respective TOC.

ModernBrain has coached students to hundreds of bids. You can read our always-growing list here.

2. What Does It Mean to Break in Speech and Debate?

In Speech and Debate, to "break" means to advance from the preliminary rounds to the elimination stages of a tournament. This achievement indicates that a participant has performed well enough in their initial speeches or debates to surpass the cutoff threshold, making them eligible for further competition and potential awards.

In larger, more competitive tournaments, breaking is essential for moving into higher-stakes elimination rounds such as quarterfinals, semifinals, and finals. These tournaments typically have a tiered structure where only the highest-ranking participants from the preliminaries advance.

In smaller tournaments, the concept of breaking can differ. Often, these events do not feature distinct elimination rounds; instead, awards are based solely on the rankings achieved during the preliminary rounds.

ModernBrain's students have broken to elimination rounds thousands of times.

3. What Does It Mean to Picket-Fence in Speech?

In Speech and Debate, "picket-fencing" refers to consistently securing first-place finishes in competitions, creating a streak of victories that resembles the evenly spaced posts of a picket fence (1111111111). Achieving this level of success requires a combination of factors, including a strong personal or cultural connection to the speech topic, crafting an appealing and universally accessible message for judges, delivering a dynamic and powerful performance, and mastering the balance of style, structure, and substance.

At ModernBrain, our national-level speech coaches specialize in training students to achieve picket-fencing success. Through personalized coaching that emphasizes connection, accessibility, performance, and comprehensive skill development, our coaches have guided numerous students to consistently top their competitions. Learn more about how our expert coaches can help you achieve picket-fencing success here.

4. What Are Schools of Honor, Excellence, or Outstanding Distinction in Speech and Debate?

In the realm of competitive Speech and Debate, the National Speech and Debate Association (NSDA) National Championship is the pinnacle event where schools vie for top honors. Among the highest accolades are the Schools of Outstanding Distinction, Schools of Excellence, and Schools of Honor. These awards recognize the most outstanding teams based on their cumulative performance in both speech and debate categories.

The awards are categorized to honor excellence in specific areas. The Schools of Outstanding Distinction recognize the top 10 schools that excel in both speech and debate, ensuring a well-rounded excellence across all divisions. Following this, the Speech Schools of Excellence and Debate Schools of Excellence honor the top 20 schools in their respective categories that did not secure an Outstanding Distinction. Additionally, the Speech Schools of Honor and Debate Schools of Honor acknowledge the next tier of top-performing schools, ranking from 21st to 40th place in speech and debate points respectively.

At ModernBrain, our expert coaches have a proven track record of leading teams to earn these prestigious national awards. Our comprehensive guide on how to join the NSDA National Championship provides invaluable insights for students aiming to compete at the highest level. It's important to participate through your school rather than an after school academy to ensure eligibility and support at this specific tournament.

5. What Is a Rank in Speech and Debate?

In Speech and Debate competitions, a rank refers to the position a competitor holds based on judges' evaluations in each round. During every round, judges assess each participant's performance and assign a rank, typically ranging from 1st place (best) to 7th place (worst). However, some tournaments may have variations, such as tying the bottom competitors at 4th-5th place to streamline rankings. These ranks are crucial as they determine which competitors advance to elimination rounds or ultimately win the tournament. Achieving a high rank consistently showcases a speaker’s or debater’s excellence and ability to resonate with judges.

Ranking is inherently subjective, as it depends on judges' perceptions and criteria, which can vary between competitions. Therefore, students must employ strategic tactics to stand out for the right reasons, ensuring their performances align with what judges are looking for.

ModernBrain recognizes the challenges posed by the subjective nature of rankings in Speech and Debate. Our expert coaches provide comprehensive strategies and detailed checklists designed to help students achieve higher rankings consistently.

6. What Are Speaker Points?

In Speech and Debate competitions, Speaker Points serve as a crucial tiebreaker. While primary factors like win-loss records in debates and rankings in speeches are the main criteria for advancing or winning, Speaker Points provide an additional layer of evaluation. These points are often scored on a scale ranging from 30 to 100, depending on the tournament, and are inherently subjective, reflecting the judges’ assessment of each participant’s performance beyond mere outcomes.

Speaker Points are awarded based on various aspects of a competitor’s presentation and strategic execution. In speech events, high Speaker Points are typically earned through strong public speaking presence, including effective use of voice modulation, body language, and overall charisma. In debate, Speaker Points focus more on the clarity and conciseness of arguments, strategic decision-making, and the ability to persuasively convey ideas.

Additionally, many tournaments feature a Top Speaker Award, which honors the highest Speaker Point earners alongside the primary debate win-loss awards, highlighting exceptional individual performances.

At ModernBrain, our dedicated coaching has empowered numerous students to excel in earning Speaker Points, leading to hundreds of Top Speaker Awards across various national competitions.

7. What Are Sweepstakes in Speech and Debate?

In Speech and Debate, Sweepstakes are prestigious team awards that recognize the overall excellence of a program rather than just individual achievements. Unlike awards that honor single competitors, Sweepstakes evaluate a team’s performance across multiple categories and events, reflecting the organization’s depth, consistency, and success in various aspects of Speech and Debate. To earn Sweepstakes, a team must demonstrate strong results in numerous areas, showcasing their ability to excel collectively rather than relying on a few standout individuals.

ModernBrain prides ourselves on our ability to secure Sweepstakes awards by maintaining a robust and versatile Speech and Debate program. Despite facing challenges such as competitors participating under different names or their own school names, ModernBrain has successfully won over 100 Sweepstakes and top team awards, including at national-level contests.

8. What Are NSDA Points/Rankings in Speech and Debate?

The National Speech & Debate Association (NSDA) Honor Society honors middle and high school students and coaches for their active participation in speech and debate activities. Members earn merit points through competitions, service, and leadership roles, encouraging them to apply their skills in diverse settings such as classroom debates, volunteering, public speaking, and stage performances. These merit points are crucial for college admissions, as NSDA is recognized by many colleges as one of the most respected honor societies.

Students can accumulate up to 75 points before achieving official membership, with points being recorded by advisors or coaches through their NSDA accounts. As members gather points, they earn new Honor Society degrees, each accompanied by a personalized seal for their membership certificates.

Consistent participation and point accumulation can lead to national rankings, such as the NSDA’s All-State or All-American lists, which serve as tier-one national rankings for college purposes. These rankings recognize students' sustained competitive success across multiple events, even if they do not win national championships. More details are listed here.

What Are The Different Speech and Debate Leagues?

1. What Is the NSDA (National Speech and Debate Association)?

The National Speech and Debate Association (NSDA) is the largest interscholastic speech and debate organization in the United States, serving both middle school and high school students. Established in 1925 as the National Forensic League by Bruno Ernst Jacob, the NSDA has a long history of fostering excellence in public speaking, critical thinking, and argumentative skills among young individuals.

  • National Championship Tournaments: Annually in June, the NSDA hosts national championship tournaments for both middle school and high school students.

    • Middle School (MS): Students can directly attend the national tournament if they have an active profile with the NSDA membership society.
    • High School (HS): High school participants must qualify for the national tournament by succeeding in their respective district competitions.
  • Membership and Resources: Being a member of the NSDA provides access to a wealth of resources, including training materials, coaching, and a supportive community dedicated to speech and debate excellence.

ModernBrain is committed to supporting the NSDA's mission by guiding students through the registration process. This assistance ensures that students can seamlessly sign up and participate in NSDA activities, maximizing their opportunities for growth and competition.

ModernBrain coaches NSDA champions at the MS and/or HS level on a yearly basis.

For more information or to register with the NSDA, visit the NSDA Signup Page.

2. What Is the UKTOC (University of Kentucky Speech and Debate Tournament of Champions)?

The University of Kentucky Speech and Debate Tournament of Champions (UKTOC) is one of the oldest and most prestigious speech and debate competitions in the United States. Hosted annually by the University of Kentucky, UKTOC attracts top-tier middle school and high school students from across the nation.

Established as one of the foremost competitions in the country, UKTOC has a long-standing reputation for high standards and competitive excellence. It is historically more renowned for its debate competitions, although speech events are also held in high regard.

High school students must earn bids to qualify for the national tournament. Bids are typically obtained by performing well in regional or district competitions throughout the competitive season. It emphasizes circuit, technical, and progressive styles of debate.

Middle school participants do not need to earn bids to attend, making it more accessible while still maintaining a high level of competition.

ModernBrain's students have excelled at the UKTOC, making consistently final rounds at the high school level and regularly winning championships at the middle school level in speech and debate.

For more information about the University of Kentucky Speech and Debate Tournament of Champions, including registration details and competition guidelines, visit the UKTOC Official Website.

3. What Is the NOFL (National Online Forensics League)?

The National Online Forensics League (NOFL) is a leading virtual speech and debate organization established during the COVID-19 pandemic to provide accessible and flexible competitive opportunities for students across various educational levels. Operating entirely online, NOFL accommodates participants from elementary school through college, ensuring that students can engage in meaningful competition regardless of their location. Competitions are held monthly and are available in both live and pre-recorded formats, allowing participants to choose the mode that best fits their schedules and preferences.

One of the key features of NOFL is its open-access model, which does not require participants to earn qualifications or bids to compete. This inclusivity makes it highly accessible and popular among after-school academies and clubs, contributing to its rapid growth. While NOFL spans competitions from elementary and middle schools to high school and college levels, it sees larger participation from elementary and middle school students compared to high school.

ModernBrain, an organization focused primarily on in-person contests, has also achieved significant success in NOFL competitions, regularly winning sweepstakes awards. Although the primary focus is on traditional, in-person speech and debate events, ModernBrain's strong performance in NOFL demonstrates its adaptability and proficiency in virtual competitive environments. Additionally, awards won through NOFL can be counted towards applications for prestigious tournaments such as the Tournament of Champions (TOC), enhancing students’ academic and extracurricular profiles.

For more information about the National Online Forensics League, including registration details and competition guidelines, visit the NOFL Official Website.

4. What Is CHSSA (the California High School Speech Association)?

The California High School Speech Association (CHSSA) is a nonprofit organization dedicated to organizing and managing championship speech and debate tournaments across the state of California. As a prominent regional league, CHSSA provides a structured platform for middle school and high school students to compete in a wide array of speech and debate categories, fostering the development of public speaking, critical thinking, and argumentative skills.

Middle school students can participate in state championships as academies without the need for prior qualifications. In contrast, high school students must first qualify for state-level tournaments by excelling in their respective leagues and representing their schools.

CHSSA operates independently of national leagues, maintaining its own set of rules and championship structures tailored specifically to the needs and standards of California’s student community.

Many of ModernBrain’s coaches have either coached CHSSA state champions or are state champions themselves, contributing to the organization’s strong performance record. Notably, ModernBrain has consistently dominated the CHSSA middle school tournaments, achieving unparalleled success by winning as many championships as all other programs combined in certain years.

For more information about the California High School Speech Association, including details on registration, competition guidelines, and upcoming tournaments, visit the CHSSA Official Website.

5. What Is the TFA (Texas Forensics Association)?

The Texas Forensics Association (TFA) serves as the governing body for speech and debate activities within the state of Texas. As the primary organization overseeing forensics education, TFA is dedicated to promoting excellence in public speaking, debate, and related disciplines among students across Texas. e state championship.

TFA structures its state championship into several divisions, accommodating different levels of competition and ensuring a fair and comprehensive evaluation of participants' skills.

While middle school students affiliated with ModernBrain are currently ineligible to attend the TFA state championship until they advance to high school, they actively participate in high school-level TFA competitions. This participation allows ModernBrain's middle schoolers to gain valuable experience, develop their skills, and accumulate the requisite points needed for their high school counterparts to qualify for the state championship.

For more information about the Texas Forensics Association, including details on upcoming events, registration procedures, and competition guidelines, visit the TFA Official Website.

6. What Is NIETOC (the National Individual Events Tournament of Champions)?

The National Individual Events Tournament of Champions (NIETOC) is renowned as the most challenging speech tournament in the United States. Typically held in May in the Midwest, NIETOC attracts the nation's top speech and debate competitors who have earned bids to participate, ensuring a highly competitive and elite environment. Attendance at NIETOC is by invitation only, requiring students to secure bids through various qualifying events that demonstrate their exceptional skills and achievements in individual forensics.

Achieving success at NIETOC is particularly demanding, as it involves accumulating rankings across the entire tournament. Competitors are evaluated by a panel of 20 to 30 judges from the preliminary rounds through to the finals, ensuring a comprehensive and thorough assessment of each participant's abilities.

ModernBrain has established a remarkable track record at NIETOC, distinguishing itself as one of the few academies in history to earn team sweepstakes.  Additionally, ModernBrain has successfully coached freshmen to national championships, showcasing the organization's commitment to developing young talent and fostering competitive success from an early stage.

For more information about NIETOC, including competition rules, registration details, and additional resources, please visit the NIETOC Official Website.

7. What Are Options in Speech and Debate for Graduates or Adults?

One prominent option is the International Public Debate Association (IPDA). IPDA welcomes individuals aged 13 and older, making it accessible to a broad audience. The association emphasizes accessibility by allowing participants to compete as independents without the need for school affiliation. Debates within IPDA are designed to be concise, typically lasting 30 minutes with an additional 30 minutes allocated for preparation. This format encourages clear, effective argumentation and quick thinking.

More information about IPDA can be found on their official website. Additionally, ModernBrain proudly features a video of one of our national champion coaches participating in an IPDA debate: Watch the Debate.

Another excellent option is the Professional Speech and Debate Association (PSDA). PSDA organizes quarterly virtual tournaments that feature simplified categories such as oratory, impromptu speaking, sparring, and interpretation. These tournaments are specifically designed for adults and are divided into two categories: experienced speakers and novices. This structure allows participants to compete at a level that matches their skill set, whether they are seasoned debaters or just beginning their public speaking journey.

ModernBrain coaches have set all-time records for the best ProSDA competitors, demonstrating our commitment to excellence in professional speech and debate. An example of a spontaneous speaking final round from ProSDA can be viewed here, and more details are available on the ProSDA website.

Toastmasters International is another well-established organization that offers extensive opportunities for public speaking and leadership development. With clubs located worldwide, Toastmasters provides a structured environment for weekly practice sessions and club-level contests that can progress to international competitions. Members prepare and deliver 5-7 minute speeches on various topics, as well as engage in spontaneous speaking exercises to enhance their impromptu speaking abilities.

Individuals interested in joining can find a local club to get started. Furthermore, ModernBrain coaches contribute to the broader speaking community by sharing their insights and strategies through the Authentalk Public Speaking Podcast, which offers valuable tips for succeeding in platforms like Toastmasters. Listen to the podcast here.